Monday, August 30, 2004

Republicans test new phrase in debate over jobs: Outsourcing is bad, insourcing is better

In reponse to Democrats' attacks on the U.S. jobs going overseas, Republicans have a new term to describe the friendlier flip side of free trade.

Insourcing is the movement of foreign jobs to the United States.

Otherwise known as foreign direct investment, some foreign firms are coming to American to set up operations.

Example: the 4,300-worker BMW factory in Greer, S.C.

Based on figures compiled by the Organization for International Investment (OFII), insourcing has accounted for adding 6.4 million jobs nationwide in 2001, which appears to represent that the growth rate for insourcing is faster than the rate of outsourcing.

This trade group is responsible for coining the term insourcing, and currently represents the U.S. subsidiaries of such corporate giants as Nestlé (Switzerland), Siemens (Germany) and Toyota (Japan).

GOP lawmakers — armed with OFII's numbers — hope to offset Democratic arguments that free trade hurts American workers. The OFII information also represents that insourced jobs pay 16.5 percent more than the average domestic job,

"Outsourcing is a matter of concern," said Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on the Senate floor, "but we are proud of the insourcing that is going on, too, and the fact there is an enormous number of foreign corporations that have come into our country because they think it has a good business environment."

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, has called outsourcing a "double blow" to U.S. workers already suffering from a rise in unemployment. He proposes requiring companies to notify their U.S. employees if they intend to hire overseas.

McConnell was the first lawmaker to mention the term insourcing on the floor of either chamber. References to insourcing have been circulating in Republican circles for several months.

House Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier (R-Calif.) sent around a "Dear Colleague" letter that introduced House members to the insourcing term and included a Feb. 4 op-ed piece from the News & Observer of Charlotte, N.C., trumpeting the benefits of insourcing.

A whitepaper on outsourcing written by the Senate Republican Policy Committee, which is chaired by Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl, also referred to the News & Observer op-ed and said, "A flip side to the consequences flowing from outsourcing is that foreign firms are also using this practice to move jobs into the United States, which provides additional benefits to U.S. workers and the economy.

"You can't get upset about outsourcing without considering the benefits of insourcing," said Todd Malan, executive director of OFII, which considered a number of terms, including "onshoring", before promoting the insourcing term.

Thea Lee, chief international economist at the AFL-CIO, said: "I think everybody welcomes inward foreign direct investment, especially when people pay good wages and don't bust unions and so on." But she cautioned that current trade numbers showed that even with insourcing, U.S. workers were on balance losing. "In terms of international engagement, we are on the losing end of that equation", she said.

The author of the News & Observer op-ed, North Carolina State University economics professor Michael Walden, told The Hill that, while insourcing has grown at a faster rate than outsourcing over the past 15 years, it has grown at a slower rate since 1994, when the North American Free trade Agreement and the Global Agreement on Tariffs and Trade were signed.

Outsourced jobs outnumber insourced ones by 3.4 million, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Democrats brought the debate to the Senate floor when Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) proposed an amendment to the corporate tax bill that would place limits on outsourcing of federally funded contracts. His amendment passed 70-26 after Dodd worked out a compromise on its language with McConnell and Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.).

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home